Blog Climate Change News General News News about Airports Recent News

Climate emergency realisation in UK to cause review of Heathrow expansion – climate change may limit future UK flying

The federal government (DfT) has admitted that considerations over climate change may prohibit the growth of flying in the UK.  The government’s statutory advisors, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) just lately stated the UK’s deliberate improve in aviation would wish to be curbed to prohibit CO2. Now a senior civil servant, Caroline Low (in cost of Heathrow expansion on the DfT) has informed Plan B Earth meaning ministers may have to review the UK’s aviation technique (due to grow to be a white paper later in 2019). The aviation technique is presently out to session, until 20th June. Plan B says the level of climate concern is so high that the decision on Heathrow expansion – the Airports NPS – must be brought again to Parliament. (It was voted for in June 2018, with carbon issues glossed over so MPs have been unaware of the extent of the issue). The DfT hopes expanding Heathrow would create financial progress and so on. When the federal government first laid out proposals for growing aviation, the UK had an general goal of chopping CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050. However the CCC now recommends that Britain should undertake a goal of internet zero emissions. Progress of aviation wants to be constrained to fit within a Internet Zero target. Caroline Low stated the DfT will now have to give aviation carbon emissions “careful consideration” and even take a look at whether the ANPS ought to be revised.


Britain’s internet zero by 2050 objective may have influence on whether present policies are reassessed

Britain’s move to “net zero” carbon and the declaration of a climate emergency in parliament shall be “given careful consideration” in deciding whether or not to grant a review of Heathrow airport’s expansion, the federal government has stated.

The new strategy falls nicely brief of any dedication to review Heathrow’s expansion, however means the choice on whether or not to grant campaigners’ request for a review will embrace the web zero goal and the climate emergency amongst its standards.

Inexperienced campaigners welcomed the pledge, which got here in a letter to environmental group Plan B. Tim Crosland, director of Plan B, stated: “We’re pleased to see the government is taking seriously our request to review the expansion of Heathrow airport. The government can either take the necessary action to avoid climate breakdown or it can stick to business as usual and expand aviation, but it can’t have it both ways.”

The letter can also be one of the primary indications of how the web zero target, beneficial last week by the committee on climate change, and parliament’s vote to recognise a climate emergency, may be taken under consideration in future by civil servants giving recommendation to ministers on key points corresponding to transport and infrastructure.

Inexperienced campaigners can be urgent the government to review present insurance policies on these points in the sunshine of the committee’s view that it’s “necessary” for the UK to be internet zero by 2050, arguing that coverage selections made previously at the moment are invalid. Plan B wrote to the government on 2 May requesting a brand new review of the airports national policy assertion (ANPS), underneath which the Heathrow expansion will take place, making that argument.

In the letter to Plan B, seen by the Guardian, [main text copied below] Caroline Low, the director of Heathrow expansion and aviation and maritime analysis at the Department for Transport (DfT), wrote: “I can affirm that the department will rigorously think about this request [for a review of the airports national policy statement, which includes Heathrow].

“As well as giving careful consideration to the net zero report and the declaration of environment and climate emergency, mentioned in the request, it may be necessary to consider the committee on climate change’s recommended policy approach for aviation … and any relevant decisions taken by the government in the coming months as a result.”

A DfT spokesperson stated: “The expansion of Heathrow acquired overwhelming help from MPs as a result of it will present an enormous economic increase to companies and communities the length and breadth of Britain, all without charge to the taxpayer and within our environmental obligations. [So many half truths and misleading impressions in that statement. AW comment]

Final week, a case introduced by Plan B and others that ministers should take the Paris climate settlement under consideration in contemplating Heathrow expansion was thrown out by the high courtroom.

Officers are also understood to consider that any selections on the request for a review are some way off because the climate change committee won’t produce its policy strategy on aviation until later this yr, so no choice on how to take its findings into consideration can be made until then. This means no suggestion to the secretary of state is probably going until subsequent yr.

Crosland responded: “The government can split hairs if they want, but the situation is too serious for that. Parliament approved Heathrow expansion on the basis of very different circumstances to those which now prevail. It’s just common sense the position calls for reconsideration. You can’t declare an emergency and then act like nothing’s changed.”

The web zero report produced by the CCC was hailed as one of the most important developments in the UK’s strategy to climate change in the last decade. The suggestions will require vast modifications to all elements of the British financial system, encompassing citizens, shoppers, companies, government and civil society.

MPs passing the vote on a “climate emergency” additionally marked a historic second in British politics, as it will, if carried out successfully, require the federal government to have regard for the climate in coverage selections throughout the board.

Siân Berry, the co-leader of the Inexperienced celebration, stated: “In this age of climate emergency, Heathrow expansion very clearly cannot go ahead. We need the government to acknowledge the emergency situation that previous policy choices have created. All building of new fossil fuel infrastructure has to end. That means banning fracking, stopping new road building and of course ending Heathrow expansion.”



Climate change ‘may curb growth in UK flying’

By Roger Harrabin (BBC setting analyst)


Considerations over climate change may prohibit the expansion of flying in the UK, the government has admitted.

The advisory Committee on Climate Change (CCC) just lately stated the UK’s planned improve in aviation would wish to be curbed to prohibit CO2.

Now a senior civil servant has advised a inexperienced group meaning ministers may have to review aviation strategy.

The group says climate concern is so excessive the decision on Heathrow expansion ought to be introduced back to Parliament.

The Division for Transport defended the proposed Heathrow expansion, saying it might “provide a massive economic boost to businesses and communities” across the UK, all at “no cost to the taxpayer and within our environmental obligations”.

Why ought to the policy change?

It is a crucial time for flying, with coverage on aviation right up to 2050 at present out for session.

When the federal government first laid out proposals for growing aviation, the UK had an general goal of chopping CO2 emissions by 80% by 2050.

But the CCC lately raised the bar of ambition in recommending that Britain ought to adopt a goal of internet zero emissions.

That may imply compensating for any greenhouse gases by either capturing the CO2 and storing it, or planting more timber.

Beneath the previous 80% state of affairs, aviation had a privileged position. Its expansion can be counter-balanced by further CO2 cuts in other sectors, like business.

The CCC makes it clear this is not an choice in a zero-carbon Britain. It says individuals will proceed flying utilizing fuels constructed from waste, or – in the long-term – electricity.

But crucially, the growth in aviation have to be constrained.

The CCC will make additional suggestions on this situation in the coming months.

How was the information revealed?

In a letter to a tiny strain group Plan B, the Division for Transport (DfT) aviation head Caroline Low stated: “It may be necessary to consider the CCC’s recommended policy approach for aviation.”

This may sound like a cautious civil servant overlaying bases, however for Plan B it’s an admission that the DfT may have to confront the notion that considerations over climate change may outweigh individuals’s want to fly extra.

Tim Crosland from Plan B informed BBC News: “We’re pleased to see the government is taking significantly our request to review the expansion of Heathrow.

“Because the (Heathrow) proposal was authorised there have been developments of immense significance.

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report spelling out the dire consequences of exceeding 1.5C average global warming; Parliament’s recognition of a state of climate and ecological emergency; and the CCC’s advice that it is ‘necessary’ for the UK to reach net zero emissions by 2050,” Mr Crosland stated.

“The federal government can either take the required motion to keep away from climate breakdown or it might stick to ‘business as usual’ and increase aviation, probably the most polluting mode of transport.

“But it can’t have it both ways.”

  • Ultimate call to save the world from ‘climate catastrophe’
  • UK Parliament declares climate change emergency

Mr Crosland noted that the Scottish authorities stated this week it might review its help for Heathrow in the light of the CCC’s internet zero report.

And he referred to as for Heathrow expansion to be brought again to Parliament.

In response, the DfT stated: “We take our dedication to the surroundings very significantly and we’ll give cautious consideration to the web zero report.

“No decision has been taken to review the Airports National Policy Statement, however we are legally obliged to consider requests like this one.”

Prof Kevin Anderson, from Manchester College, informed BBC Information that curbing the expansion in aviation can be politically potential as a result of, in his opinion, most flights are taken by the wealthy.

Comply with Roger on Twitter.


Presentational grey line